You are currently browsing all posts tagged with 'relationships'

When do you call off the hunt?

  • February 26, 2011 at 1:36 pm

Dating is a pain in the ass. I’m not good at it. I’m pretty sure I never was. Now, I find myself out there in the dating world again, after a very long break. My priorities have shifted drastically from the last time I was looking, back in 2005. At that point, I wanted to get married and have a child, yet I was looking for a few different things, throwing caution to the wind. Now that I have a child, my perspective is different. Finding a boy toy isn’t even an option for me. Instead, I am looking for a responsible partner with whom I can have fun with no pressures to settle down—although I also don’t want to play the field.

It’s a tall order, but, apparently, it’s not impossible to fill.

I’ve had two dates with a really nice man I met online. While I’m not talking about a future and each day is a mystery, I’m not terribly interested in meeting anyone else at the moment, either. The question, though, is when do you stop looking? When you’re looking for a job, you know that the search is over when you land a new position. In the dating world, do you keep your options open until the “L” bomb is dropped? Until you sleep together? Is there some sort of protocol?

I’m not good at splitting my energies among a number of men. I can’t keep things straight, and I don’t want to be confused about with whom I shared things—or worse, my feelings. So do I focus on one at a time or do I juggle? I welcome your thoughts.

Moving forward from the past

  • August 3, 2010 at 10:18 pm

I’m guessing that, like most people, you’ve probably chosen a new person because s/he reminded you of your ex. It may not have been conscious, but you did it. Perhaps you didn’t even realize you picked a certain “type” until years later. Then, with the 20/20 of hindsight, you saw everything clearly and were amazed at what you saw.

I know that I’ve done this. It’s to be expected. Life is a journey—and we choose people who reflect something in ourselves that we like or who have a trait we aspire to have. I, of course, have a type. It’s changed over my lifetime, but it’s been in about the same arena for the past decade or so. Right after my last breakup, I immediately was attracted to men who looked like my ex. It’s almost like we’re trying to fix something that happened with the previous person by moving forward with a Xerox copy in another body.

If you know me, you know I’ve said this about my ex. In some weird comic book alternate universe, he and I gave birth to his new girlfriend. She is essentially me. We could be sisters in looks, we both have a focus on kids, and today I found out that she loves Disney and peanut butter and chocolate. Eerie. I guess I should be a little flattered, but it also hurts that he chose to move on with my dopplegänger rather than remedy things with me.

Although you may want to, please don’t go reading anything into this. I do not want to resume a relationship with my ex. Believe me. I’m thrilled for the perfect boy we’ve created, but my feelings toward him end there. In fact, moving forward, I find that I am distinctly attracted to people not much like him. Now that doesn’t mean he was all bad; how could I have dated or married someone like that? I am just becoming more refined in my approach to finding a partner. I want traits I’ve experienced in the past, and I want some new things to spice it up a bit. I might have to do some kind of Hippolyte magic to create this mystery man, but I guess knowing what I want is something.

Life is an interesting psychological experiment, and if your eyes are open to the experiences, you’ll learn all kinds of things along the way—for good or bad. I know I’m learning a ton.

Take me … now!

  • June 27, 2010 at 2:00 pm

A recurring theme in my life of late is women being women and men being men. Yesterday on Facebook, there were a couple of posts about men “manning up” to take care of their women. I, of course, talked about how men should be more aggressive sexually, which led me to this post.

In this age of feminism and equality, men are “nice,” waiting for the woman to make the move. Some of my male friends have even gotten tired of being the aggressor and possibly being turned down in a relationship, so they’ve stopped trying. Let me give you a little hint, men: If you change the sexual dynamic, you’ll see a big difference in how your partner acts (and reacts).

Women tend to be the worriers in relationships. We think about taking care of the house and the children, and sex sometimes falls to the back burner. Men, on the other hand, typically have sex at the forefront of their thoughts and push everything else back. So, when a man approaches a woman for sex in a gentle, “I love you; let’s have sex” kind of way, she’s still on her to-do list for the day and will naturally refuse. The problem is that most men stop there.

Let’s be clear here: I am not condoning forceful sex or rape. Not by any stretch of the imagination. Clearly, when a woman is saying an emphatic no, she means it—especially if you’ve just met, never met, or violence is involved. What I am saying is that women like to be taken.

I have been with few sexually aggressive men in my life, but when I have been, I have loved it! I had to coach my ex-husband that, typically speaking, “no” didn’t really mean “no”; it meant he had to try a little harder. If he started touching and kissing, etc., I would get in the mood quickly. Granted, I have a higher sex drive than most women, but I’m guessing that in a loving, respectful relationship, many women would concur.

Once a man starts being a man in a relationship, the woman will usually reciprocate by being a woman. This means seducing him, incorporating lingerie, and being more sexually present. It sounds like a win-win to me.

If you have to think that hard…

  • June 26, 2010 at 2:13 pm

Lately, it seems I’m running across people who are in a quandary about their relationships—or soon-to-be relationships. Should they be with that person or not? I guess my feeling about that is: If you have to think that hard about it, it’s probably not the relationship for you.

Don’t get me wrong; I’ve been guilty of being somewhere I shouldn’t have been, holding on to the possibility of improvement just because, well, someone is better than no one. But is that really the truth? It’s kind of like taking a part-time job while waiting to find that great full-time opportunity. Is that fair to the employer, or in this case, the person with whom you’re biding your time?

If you’re of a certain age—and especially if you’re a woman—you may hear the tick-tock of that biological clock and think it’s time to settle down. Unfortunately, the first word in that phrase—”settle”—is what most people end up doing.

Naturally, it’s impossible to find a “perfect” person for you, but I suggest that you look for 80-90% of your wish list. It’s not like we have to marry and have children with everyone we date, but make sure you’re both in it for the same reason, no matter what that is. Then the choice should be relatively easy.

Friends with benefits

  • May 24, 2010 at 12:44 pm

I’ve been thinking a lot about this term “friends with benefits.” Some people call them “FBs” or shorten to “FWB”—regardless, it usually means a friend who’s available for the occasional booty call. I want to challenge that definition today. I believe that we should all be looking for FWBs.

“Hold on!” you might be thinking. “I want a relationship, not just an FWB.” My retort is that all relationships should start with friendship. Perhaps one of the benefits is a relationship. What constitutes a good relationship, though? I believe you need a solid friendship and good sex / intimacy to have a relationship. Unfortunately, too many people build on sex. When that wanes—which, I promise you, it will—where does that leave the relationship? Usually, that’s when couples fall apart, namely because they don’t have a solid base.

I know of what I speak. I have had one of the two men with whom I was in love tell me, “I want to be your best friend, but you insist you already have one. How do you think that makes me feel?” Honestly, I hadn’t thought about it. I had always separated friends from relationships. Since I have a bunch of male friends, I had a male best friend at the time, but we were not good dating partners. The person who became the dating partner felt slighted because he didn’t fill my best friend slot.

With the other “in love” man (my ex-husband), we had sex way too early on; it defined our relationship. Although we became best friends, the sex waned with the birth of our son, and we had no idea who we were for each other. The friendship hadn’t been established as the reason we were together, so we had no solid foundation.

If you grew up when I did, you’re probably well aware of the three-date rule: by the third date, if you’re not having sex, you’re not going anywhere. I dated a guy for two months and didn’t get anything; doesn’t that make us just friends? Then I had to step back and say, “What’s wrong with being friends?”

I currently have an FWB. He is one of my best friends, and we occasionally share the benefit of sex. He’s not a long-term relationship for me for other reasons, but he’s a friend before he’s anything else. As I move forward in the dating realm, I’m looking for a friend. I’m tossing that three-date rule out the window. I want to build a solid friendship with someone before I jump into bed with him. I think I’m modeling my life off Jules on Cougar Town.

The scary part is that this strategy leaves me vulnerable. My best friend and lover in one person? Open myself to someone so much? What if he leaves? I’ll be devastated! Yes, that’s very true, but if I don’t allow myself the opportunity to have a true friendship with benefits, I may miss the boat on having the best of all worlds and a really wonderful relationship.

An empty vessel’s quest to be filled

  • May 6, 2010 at 2:03 pm

Typically, at around 18, newly graduated “adults” head off to college or Europe or wherever on their quest to “find themselves.” Although most of us don’t seem to really find ourselves until much later in life, the seeds tend to be planted at this time. Lately, I am either attracting or more keenly aware of these people who have not yet found themselves. In essence, they are empty vessels who are seeking to be filled by anything or anyone.

If I had to hazard a guess, I would say most empty people walking around suffer from a lack of self-confidence, codependence, and depression. They are fearful of the world around them and tie their identities to others. But, if you never know who you are as a person, how can you truly be in a relationship with anyone else? I don’t care if it’s a friend, lover, or business partner; you need to be your own person.

When these people are not in relationships, they appear to be angry. They lash out. Everything is about them and everyone is against them. They don’t have any security within themselves, so everything else has to be about them, right? Everyone’s out to get them. It’s a sad, lonely existence. Perhaps getting into a relationship to find identity there is the only way these empty people can feel whole – at least momentarily.

Once upon a time, we used to call these types “fixer-uppers.” In relationships, there was typically a fixer and one who needed to be fixed. The problem, however, is that once the “broken” person is fixed, s/he asks him/herself who s/he really is – and often realizes it’s not the person after whom s/he has been modeling for so long. Then come the feelings of true – although often short-lived – identity. “I am not the person you think I am! I am my own person! You can’t accept me for who I am!”

Famke Janssen & Patrick Stewart in "The Perfect Mate"

The best example of this I can muster is an episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation (“The Perfect Mate”) in which the Enterprise is transporting an empathic metamorph, who bonds with Picard. She has learned everything in her life to be for her mate. “I am for you, Alrik of Valt,” is her mantra – and she is. She is not for herself. That is who these empty vessels are; they want so much to make others happy that they sacrifice themselves in the process.

The tragedy is that she bonds with Picard – yet is betrothed to another. She says that, since she is an empath, her husband will never know, but how can she be happy in that relationship? If she had created her own identity, outside of a potential partner, she could always rely on herself while providing so much more depth to the relationship.

The problem with being for someone else is that, while it’s flattering to have another human being want to be all things to you, it gets old – for everyone. How can one person take full responsibility for another’s happiness? It’s not possible. Eventually, the person who is not true to him/herself will be frustrated that the other person is not as appreciative of the efforts as s/he might think is appropriate. The other half of the partnership will feel the burden of having a partner who must be supported and built up to find him/herself. It’s a lose-lose situation.

To create a successful relationship of any kind, both parties need to be complete and whole within themselves. It’s enough work to keep ourselves happy, much less to have to worry about how our loved ones and business associates are doing. Until the empty vessel is filled, however, s/he will continue to be on a quest for the proper “Kool-aid” to make him/her feel whole.

There are no winners in a partnership

  • April 14, 2010 at 8:40 pm

JERRY: We all want the hand. Hand is tough to get. You gotta get the hand right from the opening.

GEORGE: You can’t break up with me. I’ve got hand.
NOEL: And you’re going to need it.
– From Seinfeld, “The Pez Dispenser”

Tonight, while exchanging my son and signing tax paperwork, my ex-husband was being nice. He told me I should let him know what’s going on with me financially as it concerns our joint interests. I told him I never know which person he’ll be: the nice guy or the mean guy. I like the nice guy, but I can totally do without the mean guy. He then said something about how I’ve always had the upper hand and that’s influenced how he’s been. At that moment, I didn’t feel like I had any kind of hand, which I told him, but then I had a lot of time to think about it on the 20 miles back home.

It’s not that I wanted hand – at any point in our relationship – at least not consciously. In a true partnership, no one really ever should have hand, at least not for long. I think that a relationship is a balance of power, with one person taking charge in certain areas and the other being ahead in the others. If you’re an avid reader of this blog, you know that I am on a quest to be more vulnerable and in touch with my feminine side. In the past, acting more from my male side, I attracted men who were acting more from their female side. Because of that, I tended to take charge of things: bills, decisions, childcare, you name it. Of course, deep down, the men really wanted to take care of all of those things, but either they weren’t able to or I didn’t let them – or a combination of both.

The truth about having hand in a relationship is that it doesn’t serve anyone. As in the Seinfeld episode, George was left alone with his hand, which is where one usually is when taking advantage of another in what is supposed to be a joint partnership. Too often, though, this is how relationships go. One person has more control, the other resents it and never says anything, and there is a huge communication breakdown. It’s really too bad that it goes that way – and all because someone needs to win. The definition of a partnership implies playing together nicely as equals. I think that, if we remember our roles as men and women, we’re more likely to create working partnerships.

Codependence: Does it take two?

  • March 28, 2010 at 1:11 pm

Just looking at the word, one might automatically assume that codependency refers to two people being so interconnected that one cannot survive without the other. In fact, that’s what I always thought, which was a big reason I never wanted to need anyone. I was trying to avoid that codependency. Of course, the truth is that when a love relationship ends without your wanting it to, it often feels as if your arm has been ripped from its socket. But that is not codependency; that is a deep love and connection.

According to Wikipedia, codependency is marked by low self-esteem, self-sabotaging behavior in relationships, and a need to control. Typically, it is a learned behavior from our preponderance of dysfunctional homes in which one parent is some kind of addict while the other is codependent and enables the negative behavior, due to feelings of unworthiness or fear of being alone. Often, it seems as if the addict-codependent relationship is the status quo among couples. In fact, in my past, I married two addicts and dated both addicts and codependents. I used to believe that the same characteristics could not live within one person, but the more I think about it, I think someone can really be both. I’m pretty sure my ex-husband has that capacity. So does that mean an addict needs a codependent or vice versa?

The more I learn, the more I think not. I’m not exactly sure why we choose who we do in relationships, but I have heard of addicts partnering with other addicts, codependents living in harmony, and pretty normal folks doing great. The scarier part is that I’m not sure I know too many in the last category; most of my normal friends seem to be single. In fact, when a friend said to me, “Think of the happily married couples you know…” I had to admit I’m not sure I know any. Sure, on the surface they may seem to be, but I know a bit of the “behind-the-scenes” stuff and most are struggling as I have in the past. What’s the solution?

Codependents Anonymous offers these patterns and characteristics as a tool to aid in self-evaluation.

Denial Patterns:

  • I have difficulty identifying what I am feeling.
  • I minimize, alter, or deny how I truly feel.
  • I perceive myself as completely unselfish and dedicated to the well being of others.

Low Self-Esteem Patterns:

  • I have difficulty making decisions.
  • I judge everything I think, say, or do harshly, as never “good enough.”
  • I am embarrassed to receive recognition and praise or gifts.
  • I do not ask others to meet my needs or desires.
  • I value others’ approval of my thinking, feelings, and behavior over my own.
  • I do not perceive myself as a lovable or worthwhile person.

Compliance Patterns:

  • I compromise my own values and integrity to avoid rejection or others’ anger.
  • I am very sensitive to how others are feeling and feel the same.
  • I am extremely loyal, remaining in harmful situations too long.
  • I value others’ opinions and feelings more than my own and am afraid to express differing opinions and feelings of my own.
  • I put aside my own interests and hobbies in order to do what others want.
  • I accept sex when I want love.

Control Patterns:

  • I believe most other people are incapable of taking care of themselves.
  • I attempt to convince others of what they “should” think and how they “truly” feel.
  • I become resentful when others will not let me help them.
  • I freely offer others advice and directions without being asked.
  • I lavish gifts and favors on those I care about.
  • I use sex to gain approval and acceptance.
  • I have to be “needed” in order to have a relationship with others.

Obviously, just like a horoscope, everyone can see themselves in the above. It’s more about if you define yourself by the indicators. Even though my marriage counselor said I have some codependency issues, I only see a few of these as describing me. Most of the ones with which I identify relate to the end of my marriage, such as staying longer than I should have – because of having a small child.

Where do you see yourself on the spectrum? Do you think codependency can happen in a vacuum or is another person needed?

Do you “need” your partner?

  • March 26, 2010 at 4:28 pm

Do you ever notice that songs sometimes seem to be speaking just to you? I feel like that from time to time, and this morning one got to me. I was listening to my iPhone while I was getting ready for work and Train’s “Hopeless” came on. I love Train, but I’m pretty sure I had not really heard the song before. If I had, I surely hadn’t been listening. The song, sung from a man’s perspective, says that the woman needs no one. That got me thinking. Since feminism sprouted in the 70s, women have been told not to need a man. “We can do it ourselves!” is the mantra. Unfortunately, men want to feel needed in a relationship. They crave it; it makes them feel whole and loved.

I know this firsthand. I never wanted to need anyone. I felt that was somehow admitting defeat. Instead, I presented myself as independent and self-sufficient. My choice was to run when things got tough. After all, I didn’t need my partner, did I? Why not get the hell out of there? Even my ex-husband told me at one point, “You’re a rock; you don’t need anyone.” I will never forget where I was or how I felt when he told me that. I wasn’t that person – not by a long shot – but that’s the story I was telling him – and anyone else who would listen. He had every reason to think that about me because I had sold him a bill of goods.

I’ve learned that it’s not weak to need someone or something. In my quest to become vulnerable, I ride a fine line between being an independent single mom and business owner while remaining open to having a partner in my life. I will admit that, while I can certainly survive without one, once that partner appears, I will need him to stay. It’s not easy to say that, let me tell you, but I know it’s a huge part of what a man has to hear to be completely immersed in a relationship. Their genetic makeup tells them they have to take care of their women. If she won’t let him, he feels as if he’s failed. Another poignant memory for me is when an ex told me he hated that I said another male friend from high school was my best friend: “I’m your boyfriend. I want to be your best friend.” Translation: he wanted to feel needed and he didn’t.

Women, are you making the men in your life feel as if they’re the center of your world? I guarantee you that if you let down your guard a bit, the rewards will be unlimited. He will reciprocate by putting you on a pedestal and ensuring that you are well taken care of. Damn feminism; it really is screwing up with the male-female dynamic.

Here’s the aforementioned song. Take a listen and see if you can relate.

Showing love

  • March 22, 2010 at 7:42 am

How do you feel loved? I was thinking about that as I fell asleep last night. Everyone feels loved in different ways, but I fear that we just assume that what makes us feel appreciated is universal. For my part, one of the things that makes me feel loved is when a man touches my face or pushes hair out of my face. I don’t know what that’s about, but it feels so intimate to me. It’s funny that sometimes Patrick does that to me when it’s windy and my hair gets in my eyes. Of course, there’s a huge difference in parent-child love, but I know he wouldn’t do that with just anyone.

When Jeff (my ex) and I were going through marriage counseling, one of the exercises our counselor gave us was to write down how we felt loved. I’m not even sure if this one made my list. I remember that Jeff said when I cooked for him he felt loved. I think both of us were thinking of more superficial, everyday things, because saying “I love you” made my list. That’s kind of obvious, of course, but it counts. I think if I had to make that list now, it would look like this (in no particular order):

  • Touching my face
  • Calling when we’re apart just to say hi and “I love you”
  • Kissing me for no reason and with no expectations
  • Walking on the street side of the sidewalk when we’re walking together
  • Telling me “I love you”
  • Touching my hand or leg when we’re sitting together

I’m sure there are plenty more because there are a million ways to show and receive love. I’ve not been in a relationship for years now, so these probably more represent the things I miss most.

How do you feel loved?