The other evening, I carpooled to a happy hour event with a male friend of mine. We parked in three-hour parking, and both of us agreed that we would likely be ready to leave in that time period. However, when the time came, there was a one-hour discussion about whether or not we were leaving.
My friend asked me point blank if I was ready to leave. I said yes more than once. Yet, the discussion continued. Because I was concerned about getting a parking ticket, I agreed to take the car to another location where more friends would be. Even then, though, my friend somehow thought that we were just moving the car and heading back to the same bar.
At the next location, he asked me to let him know when I wanted to leave. “I wanted to leave two hours ago,” I said. I explained that I had told him that a number of times, but I was now willing to stay at this location until 11 pm, but at that point, I would be leaving—with or without him. He wanted to continue the discussion ad naseam, but I cut it short saying I was leaving at 11. End of discussion.
What is it with communication? I said exactly what I meant, I didn’t stutter or waffle about it, and yet my male friend still figured I meant something else. He explained that he is used to women saying one thing and meaning another, so he rarely takes women at their word. What? I’m sorry, but that’s just ridiculous. Have women changed the communication spectrum that much that I have to figure out how to say things backwards so men understand me? Why can’t we just say what we mean?
What are your thoughts on the topic?
Get Our Newsletter!
The other night, as I was speaking with the man I’m dating, Seinfeld’s quip that 95% of the population is undateable came up. I’ve long agreed with this, and since L is also a big Seinfeld fan, it’s not surprising that he believes it’s true as well. The conversation went all around the place and then he said it depends on where you put that person: doable, dateable, or relationshipable (fun with words!). Obviously, the percentages would be different based on how you choose to label a person.
When you’re up for a stressful interview or date and you ask advice of others, you’re likely to hear: “Just be yourself.” It’s definitely sound advice and a great way to live your life. My thought is that we should always be true to ourselves. Granted, in some situations, we have to hold back certain aspects, but you don’t want to put on your work identity at 8 am and then your home identity at 5 pm. They should be similar enough that you don’t feel like two completely different people given the situation.
When kids are about two years old, they learn the word “No.” They seem to use it all the time, driving their parents nuts.
Life is short. Too short, in my opinion, to waste time worrying and thinking negative thoughts. This week, I have seen a lot of negative in this life. A friend’s 19-year-old daughter died from suicide. A client was unhappy with my work and chose to go in another direction. A negative networker was verbally abusive to me and another colleague. My ex-husband’s fiancée attacked me by commenting on this blog. So many things happen every day that can weigh us down and sour our disposition.
I have completed reading The 5 Love Languages, and I even took the profile test to see which language is mine. It’s a close tie between “acts of service” and “words of affirmation.” I think the former is more because I have a strong desire to feel safe and cared for in a relationship. The latter is pretty self-evident.
I just started reading
Sometimes, it would be nice to have a time machine to go back and look at relationships to see if they really were like we’ve built them in our memories. It’s rare that we have the opportunity to get that hindsight view, unless we revisit that previous relationship—almost never a good idea.